![[FREE EBOOK] Strategic Vietnam IT Outsourcing: Optimizing Cost and Workforce Efficiency](https://vti.com.vn/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/cover-mockup_ebook-it-outsourcing-20230331111004-ynxdn-1.png)
In our previous guide, we covered what Application Managed Service (AMS) is, its core benefits, and who benefits the most from it. If you’ve determined to insert it into your IT strategy, your next critical decision is selecting the right AMS provider. This is the choice that will significantly impact your application performance, operational costs, and team productivity.
Because not all providers deliver the same value, and choosing the wrong one can lead to service disruptions, budget overruns, and compliance risks.
Therefore, whether you’re a CIO looking to optimize costs, a CTO seeking to improve application performance, or an IT director planning a digital transformation, please consider the following criteria:
- A systematic evaluation framework
- Comparison of leading global AMS providers
- Pricing models and cost structures to expect
- Best practices for successful vendor relationships
Please consider this comprehensive guide as your practical framework to make precise decisions on your partnership.
Risk when Choosing Wrong Vendors
Not all providers deliver the same value. The wrong choice creates challenges that extend far beyond initial cost considerations. Therefore, understanding these risks helps you recognize blind spots in the current assessment and avoid costly mistakes.
Financial Impact & Hidden Costs
Poor vendor selection often leads to budget overruns from unexpected charges for application development and management services assumed to be included. Change requests, additional licenses, and out-of-scope support can inflate costs by 30-50% beyond estimates.
Switching costs compound the damage – migration expenses, knowledge transfer, and service disruptions during transitions can reach six or seven figures for enterprise applications.
Therefore, you’d better look for vendors with a clear pricing methodology for Managed Service and AMS, specifically.
Operational Disruptions & Service Quality Issues
An underqualified AMS provider struggles to maintain service levels, causing frequent outages and extended resolution times.
Poor incident response procedures create cascading problems when providers lack proper escalation protocols or adequate staffing for their time zone. Response delays of 30-60 minutes can transform minor issues into business-impacting crises.
Hence, the MSP with certifications like ITIL is always a reliable option.
Security Vulnerabilities & Compliance Failures
The AMS provider with weak security practices expose organizations to breaches that cost an average of $4.44 million globally, not counting reputational damage.
For example, GDPR (Euro) penalties can reach up to €20 million or 4% of annual global revenue. HIPAA (USA) violations carry fines up to $2.13 million per violation category per year.
In Asia, Japan’s APPI fines up to ¥100 million (~$700,000), while Singapore’s PDPA charges up to $1 million or 10% of annual turnover.
Customers and stakeholders don’t distinguish between internal IT and external vendors – they see one failed service. In other words, your organization takes final responsibility for compliance failures even when caused by your provider.
Thus, seeking a vendor with experience dealing with compliance in your target market is sensible.
Cultural Misalignment and Communication Breakdowns
This factor is often neglected due to the traditional preference for local vendors. However, your vendor can now come from any country, due to financial or expertise advantages. This turns cultural alignment into a must-have in your checklist.
Incompatible working styles between your organization and provider create friction that undermines collaboration. Communication preferences, decision-making processes, and problem-solving approaches that clash with your culture generate inefficiency.
Time zone mismatches and language barriers compound these challenges when critical issues arise outside your provider’s primary working hours.
Strategic Limitations and Innovation Stagnation
Providers focused solely on maintenance may hold back DX initiatives.
Inflexible service models prevent adaptation as your organization grows, enters new markets, or adopts new technologies, forcing costly provider transitions.
Organizations may prefer those AMS partners with a progressive culture that proactively identifies optimization opportunities and helps modernize your app portfolios.
This is not only a solution for the present but also a preparation for future growth.
Understanding these risks reinforces why careful provider evaluation deserves significant time and attention. The evaluation framework in the next section helps you identify providers who will truly support your success.
How do I choose an AMS provider? – 7 Must-Ask Questions
The managed application services market offers numerous options, making a structured approach essential for finding the best fit.
This requires careful evaluation of multiple factors that directly impact your app performance and business operations.
The following are things that you might want to consider:
1. Technical Expertise & Industry-specific Experience
Your chosen provider must demonstrate deep technical knowledge in your specific tech stack and industry requirements.
Look for providers with proven experience managing applications similar to yours, whether they’re legacy systems, cloud-native applications, or hybrid environments.
Application management expertise should include both current technologies and emerging platforms your organization plans to adopt.
A plus point is industry certifications (ITIL, CMMI, etc.) and partnerships with major technology vendors (Amazon, Microsoft, etc.), indicating a commitment to staying current with best practices.
No less important, ask potential providers about their experience with your sector. Retail is different from manufacturing; so are healthcare and construction.
It will be a big advantage if they get know-how about industry-specific regulatory requirements. This knowledge directly impacts implementation success.
2. Clear Pricing Models & Cost Structure
One of the most important criteria is undoubtedly transparent pricing structures. This clarity helps you accurately forecast costs and avoid unexpected expenses.
Typically, AMS providers offer four main pricing models:
- Time & Materials Model: Bills based on actual hours worked and dedicated FTE resources with rates varying by seniority and specialization. This is the best fit for organizations with unpredictable workloads and frequent application changes. You should establish clear governance to prevent budget overruns and request detailed usage reports for cost visibility.
- Per-Server Model: Charges based on the number of servers under management, including monitoring, patching, and maintenance activities. It is ideal for those with stable infrastructure footprints with well-defined server counts in on-premises or IaaS environments. One thing to consider is to clarify how virtual machines, containers, and serverless architectures are counted in pricing.
- Per-Application Model: Pricing determined by application-specific variables including complexity, criticality, service levels, maturity, and user count. Organizations undergoing DX with frequently changing application portfolios are recommended for this. For this model, it is essential to clearly define application boundaries and ensure pricing reflects actual complexity, not just application counts.
- Request-Based Model: Bills according to the number of support requests and incidents processed monthly, with contract reviews every 6 months. This works best for very stable applications with consistent, low-volume support needs. To have most of it, you should define clearly what constitutes a “request” versus an “incident” to avoid disputes during transformation projects.
Trusted providers will consult with you on the best fit model after assessing your environment, such as the scope of work, historical data (ticket volumes, resolution times, outages), current SLAs, service requirements, application complexity, and so on.
For organizations without historical data, an AMS provider might run trial phases (1-3 months) to validate assumptions before finalizing pricing.
This is just the top of the giant iceberg. To get a more detailed understanding of how to calculate your pricing model and choose the right approach for your organization, we have prepared a comprehensive guide.
3. Standardized Service Level Agreements (SLAs) & Performance Metrics
The best enterprise application management services include detailed performance metrics that align with your business objectives and industry standards.
They should not only report metrics but also maintain clear benchmark standards for comparison.
It is best to request detailed SLA documentation that specifies measurement methodologies, exclusions, and credit structures. Based on that, you can compare them with some industry standards, such as uptime commitments (99,9% – 99,99%) or a Mean Time to Resolution (MTTR) of 15-24 hours for financial services and 32-48 hours for healthcare.
4. Strong Security Compliance & Data Protection
Data security represents a non-negotiable requirement in today’s threat landscape. Your AMS provider must demonstrate comprehensive security frameworks that meet or exceed your organization’s standards. This includes encryption protocols, access controls, vulnerability management processes, and incident response procedures.
Compliance with industry regulations such as PDPA (Singapore), APPI (Japan), or HIPAA (USA) should be verified through third-party audits and certifications.
Moreover, evaluate the provider’s approach to data residency requirements, especially for global organizations operating across multiple jurisdictions with varying data protection laws.
5. Cultural Fit & Communication Protocols Evaluation
As mentioned, cultural alignment impacts long-term partnership success. Effective communication ensures smooth collaboration between your internal teams & the AMS provider.
Therefore, you should also evaluate providers based on their communication styles, reporting frequency, escalation procedures, and whether the provider’s approaches complement your organization’s culture.
Time zone coverage and experience with local companies become particularly important for global organizations requiring 24/7 support.
6. Advanced Technology Adaptation Capabilities
This is one factor that should be taken into account when it comes to future expansion plans.
Compared to changing vendors, it will be more efficient and cost-saving if the chosen one can flexibly scale services up or down based on changing business requirements.
In the fast-paced era of next generation application management, when many advanced technologies are introduced continuously, from cloud migration to AI integration, this is worth considering.
7. Reference checks and Case Study Validation
Finally, direct feedback from current and former clients provides valuable insights into provider performance and reliability.
Request references from organizations similar to yours in size, industry, and technical complexity. Case studies offer concrete examples of how providers have solved challenges similar to those your organization faces.
Pay particular attention to how providers have handled difficult situations, such as major outages, security incidents, or complex migrations.
Their approach to problem-solving and crisis management often determines long-term partnership success.
Top 5 AMS Provider in ASIA
Considering the above criteria, we have curated the Top 5 AMS vendors in Asia that can support your application management
VTI:
VTI combines the latest ITIL framework discipline with AI-driven automation to deliver predictable, auditable operations and lower run costs across important-to-operation applications.
Following strictly ITIL v4-compliant workflows for incident management, problem resolution, change control, and release management ensures the provision of standardized processes. VTI’s detail SLA levels as well as pricing methodology are openly shared with clients for transparency.
As a pioneering tech provider, VTI integrates AI-powered automation for proactive issue detection, predictive maintenance, and automated runbook execution. This reduces manual intervention and shortens Mean Time to Resolution (MTTR) while maintaining the high level of governance and control in ITIL framework.
Their regional delivery model serves Asia-Pacific enterprises with engineering teams across Vietnam, Japan, Korea, and Singapore, providing timezone coverage and multilingual support (English, Korean, Japanese). Also, you can choose flexible coverage options (24×5, 24×7, 16×7, 16×5, 8×5, 8×7, 4×5,…).
Finally, security practices are embedded throughout the delivery model (onsite, onshore, nearshore, or offshore), qualified by latest certifications like ISO27001/2022.
Best for: Medium-to-large Asian enterprises, especially ones in Japan, South Korea, and Southeast Asia, seek a balanced approach between cost, process maturity, and innovation.
Ideal for organizations requiring flexible service coverage options, ITIL-compliant standardization, and AI-enhanced efficiency without the premium pricing of tier-one global consultancies.
Samsung SDS:
As the IT services arm of the Samsung group, Samsung SDS combines deep systems-integration experience with strong capabilities in cloud, AI/analytics (Brightics), IoT and industry-specific solutions for manufacturing, retail and logistics.
Their platform-led approach and device/ecosystem affinity make them effective at integrating edge, device and back-office systems for large-scale operational transformation. Samsung SDS often emphasizes security, operational continuity and industrial use-cases where tight hardware-software integration is valuable.
Their strongest footprint is in APAC (Korea-first) and in customers that benefit from Samsung ecosystem integration; global coverage and commercial models may be less uniform than global tier-one integrators.
Best for: Large enterprises in APAC – especially manufacturers, retail and logistics operators – that need close hardware-software integration, IoT/edge solutions and platform-led modernization.
NTT DATA:
NTT DATA offers broad, enterprise-grade AMS built on deep systems-integration, consulting and global delivery scale.
Their strengths include strong coverage for heavily regulated sectors (financial services, healthcare, government), Japan-market expertise, and end-to-end program delivery from transformation consulting through run. NTT Data’s global footprint and stable operating model help deliver predictable performance for complex, mission-critical estates.
Yet, the scale and process maturity that deliver stability can also add program complexity and cost; expect formal governance and longer onboarding for large transformations.
Best for: Multinational and enterprise organizations seeking proven SI + AMS capabilities, compliance/regulatory expertise, and reliable global delivery – particularly those with significant Japan operations.
Classmethod:
Classmethod is a Japan-based cloud-native specialist focused on AWS-led modernization, DevOps, data/analytics and agile application development.
They are known for hands-on engineering, fast cloud migrations, and building automated delivery pipelines and analytics stacks for product teams. Classmethod’s strength is rapid, flexible cloud-first delivery with deep Japan-market knowledge and strong AWS partnership credentials.
Classmethod is optimized for cloud-native and AWS-centric projects; it may be less suited for large legacy, multi-vendor on-prem estates that require wide global delivery scale.
Best for: Organizations in Japan and APAC pursuing cloud-first modernization, DevOps adoption, or AWS-native application rebuilds that want an engineering-focused, agile partner.
Fujitsu:
Fujitsu combines broad systems-integration and managed-services experience with a strong presence in infrastructure, cloud and enterprise application management.
Their offerings emphasize secure, resilient operations, hybrid-cloud platforms and co-creation with clients to modernize and operate large, heterogeneous IT estates.
Fujitsu’s global delivery and sector experience (public sector, telco, manufacturing) make them a solid choice for integrated infrastructure + application management programs.
As a large, established vendor, Fujitsu’s models can be premium and formal – advantageous for scale and governance but potentially heavy for organizations seeking very lean or ultra-agile arrangements.
Best for: Large enterprises and public-sector organizations needing integrated infrastructure and AMS with strong security, compliance and global delivery capabilities, especially in Japan and APAC.
How to Succeed when Working with an AMS Provider? – 6 Best Practices
Selecting the right AMS provider represents only half the equation for successful application management outsourcing.
The rest materializes through effective collaboration, clear governance, and proactive relationship management after contract signing.
Organizations that establish robust operational frameworks from day one maximize their AMS investment and avoid common pitfalls that undermine vendor partnerships. And here are some best practices for your reference.
1. Onboarding & Transition Management
Structured onboarding: Develop a comprehensive onboarding plan covering contract finalization, role definitions, initial KPI/SLA targets, and system access provisioning.
Clear documentation ensures your vendor can deliver value immediately rather than spending months understanding your environment.
Knowledge transfer planning: Document critical information, including business requirements, system architectures, configurations, and business logic, before transition begins.
Assign internal experts to conduct structured knowledge transfer sessions using manuals, standard processes, and checklists to make tacit knowledge explicit.
Gradual handover approach: Phase the transition over several months with overlap between outgoing and incoming teams.
Start with low-risk tasks and establish test periods before transferring mission-critical responsibilities. This staged approach prevents service gaps and provides time to address issues before they impact operations.
2. Communication Protocols
Establish regular touchpoints: Define communication frequency, including daily stand-ups for operational issues, weekly status calls for progress tracking, and monthly reviews for strategic alignment.
And, it’s better to define preferred communication channels and escalation paths to ensure issues reach the right stakeholders quickly.
Maintain transparency through documentation: Record meeting summaries, decisions, and action items in shared repositories.
Use collaborative dashboards to track progress and ensure both parties have visibility into ongoing work.
Clear documentation prevents misunderstandings and provides audit trails when needed.
3. Performance Monitoring
Define measurable SLAs and KPIs: Translate business objectives into specific, measurable targets covering system uptime, response times, ticket resolution speeds, and other critical metrics.
Document these clearly in contracts to establish accountability from the outset.
Conduct regular performance reviews: Monitor vendor performance continuously through weekly dashboards and monthly business reviews.
Track trends over time to identify improvement opportunities before minor issues become major problems.
Schedule quarterly executive reviews to discuss strategic alignment and make necessary adjustments.
Implement formal issue management: Maintain detailed logs of missed SLAs and quality issues.
Address problems promptly through structured review processes that create accountability and drive continuous improvement.
4. Relationship Governance
Establish a formal governance structure: Assign a dedicated Vendor Manager or Steering Committee responsible for contract oversight, change approvals, and decision-making.
Clear accountability prevents confusion and ensures consistent vendor management across your organization.
Centralize documentation: Maintain a single storage for all AMS-related materials, including contracts, change requests, performance reports, and contact information.
Organized records ensure continuity during staff transitions and simplify audits.
Schedule executive-level reviews: Beyond operational meetings, conduct quarterly leadership reviews to assess strategic alignment, evaluate overall partnership health, and make course corrections.
Executive involvement demonstrates commitment and prevents scope creep.
5. Knowledge Retention Strategies
Require continuous documentation: Treat system knowledge as a strategic asset.
Mandate that vendors maintain current documentation of architectures, procedures, and customizations in your repositories.
This protects your organization against vendor personnel changes.
Facilitate joint training: Arrange side-by-side work sessions, Q&A forums, and problem-solving workshops where your team and vendor staff collaborate.
This transfers unspoken knowledge that documentation alone cannot capture.
Conduct knowledge audits: Periodically verify that critical knowledge resides internally through staff rotations or assessment exercises.
Address identified gaps immediately through targeted cross-training or documentation updates.
6. 4 Steps to Manage Provider Transitions
When switching AMS vendors, focus on maintaining business continuity throughout the transition:
- Plan for overlap: Keep outgoing and incoming providers working together during a transition period. Run parallel support phases where the new team handles live workloads under supervision before full responsibility transfer.
- Execute comprehensive handovers: Transfer all relevant assets, including source code, configurations, documentation, and access credentials. Update security protocols immediately after transition completion.
- Align service levels: Document existing SLAs clearly and ensure the new provider matches or exceeds current performance standards. Establish clear performance targets and review schedules from day one.
- Mitigate transition risks: Identify potential problems, including data loss, downtime, or compliance gaps. Assign risk owners, develop mitigation plans, and maintain detailed risk registers throughout the transition. Ensure your new contract includes clear termination clauses as contingency planning.
Final words
Choosing the right AMS provider can transform how your organization manages applications while freeing up internal resources for innovation and growth.
The key lies in understanding your specific needs, evaluating providers against clear criteria, and selecting a partner that aligns with your technical requirements and business objectives.
Remember that the most expensive option isn’t always the best fit – focus on finding a provider that offers the right balance of expertise, service quality, and cost-effectiveness for your unique situation.
Take time to thoroughly assess potential partners, check references, and ensure cultural alignment before making your decision.
With the right AMS provider, you’ll gain peace of mind knowing your applications are in capable hands while your team focuses on driving business value.
